New Video of Rendlesham Forest incident to be revealed by retired military man

This is an interesting development to the Rendlesham case:

http://www.runcornandwidnesworld.co.uk/news/4680975.A_coup_will_see_amazing_UFO_revelations_at_paranormal_event_in_Runcorn/

My question is why did this man sit on the footage for nearly 30 years? I and others have been questioning the integrity of the people involved. Sgt Penniston, LtCol Halt and others have had their characters maligned and treated like liars, hoaxers or crazies by many out there.
That is not right to put them through all of that and have them jeopardize their careers over this incident.

To say I am a little mad with this person is an understatement. Still, it is better late than never with this footage if it turns out to be the proof needed to vindicate these men.

It is going to be shown at a UFO event on October 23rd, 2009.

This is par for course, and it still doesn't explain WHY.

If the picture is right thus far, people were allowed close enough to view the craft. Sketches were made of the glyphs, and at least 1 if not 2 of them are understandable, connecting to the symbol I have been tracking.

First hypothesis (still subject to correction):
The landing was identical in explanation to the Zamora sighting because of the glyphs involved. It doesn't go any further than that.

We shall see what this new film has to say

This new revelation makes no sence. Why now, after soooo many years of total silence, that these photos
existed all a long.

Unless, of course, he was under strong orders to not say anything about this and was fearfull for his safety and
decided to not reveal those photos.

However, I remember reading and/or seeing a report where he mentioned those photos (or someone else from that night
mentioned it) that they took that night, and the photos were confiscated by men in black. If this is the case, about the photos being confiscated, then how did he get possession of them again ???

Unless this is a part of the UK's UFO disclosure project.

Doesn't matter. See this ...



... this is all I need to prove something. It's kind of like this ...



... it's all I needed. Why? Cuz I know a secret LOL.

ALBERT wrote:

This new revelation makes no sence. Why now, after soooo many years of total silence, that these photos
existed all a long.

Unless, of course, he was under strong orders to not say anything about this and was fearfull for his safety and
decided to not reveal those photos.

However, I remember reading and/or seeing a report where he mentioned those photos (or someone else from that night
mentioned it) that they took that night, and the photos were confiscated by men in black. If this is the case, about the photos being confiscated, then how did he get possession of them again ???

Unless this is a part of the UK's UFO disclosure project.

It sounds like they were taken by an MP and it is possible that he had some sort of career concerns or something like that which kept him from coming forward sooner. Also, possible it is some sort of hoax. I guess we should find out in a few days.

I am also thinking from the standpoint of the courageous people who came forward with this case and faced ridicule and harassment, not to mention many who are skeptical of this case like me.

I really hope the footage vindicates those men, and not just for the monetary enrichment of the person showing the footage.

Apparently there is no footage or something weird is going on -

Quote :

Dear all,

I spoke with Larry Warren yesterday for about half an hour, he
in Liverpool, me in New York State. Larry does not have email
and rarely spends time on the Internet, though I hope he will
soon have a computer and an email address.

I told him about the coverage and the announcement on the
Internet that he was going to reveal Rendlesham related
'footage' at was being billed at a fairly substantial event.

Larry was totally surprised, angered and disgusted with this
totally false information.

Larry does not speak at many UFO or related conferences,
symposia or like events, and told me his only reason for
agreeing to appear at what is rather a modest paranormal
conference at a branch of the Liverpool Public Library, was that
attendance will benefit a local reading program.

His was, and has remained, to talk about the Rendlesham
incident, play a copy of Col. Halt's tape for the audience, and
take questions. And that is it.

Your assistance in helping me to correct this falsehood is
appreciated.


Many thanks,

Peter

Peter Robbins

The Plot thickens.

Either this was a publicity stunt or poor management skills at the event Mr Warren was going to speak at. Either way this is a disappointment.

I am wondering how many tickets will be refunded after this little bombshell.

As ALBERT says, the plot thickens...

Yes, but the Silence is revealing.
Marksbrother

Yesterday I read an article that went into great detail about how and to what extremes groups will go to to discredit sightings and events. There seems to be a rash of it going on right now. I suspect it is retaliation for all of the pressure the Government is getting right now. So my advice is that any new developments should be taken with a grain of salt until it is proven to be true.

it seems simple enough, he faked it. theres no reason for him to set on this all this time while others were getting crap for reporting it.

if im not mistaken on one ufo files on history channel in one of his interviews he said he or someone else had something that when it came out would change everyones mind. if anyone else remembers this let me know i may have it wrong.