UFO Magazine Blog | |
April 2024 | Sun | Mon | Tue | Wed | Thu | Fri | Sat |
---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 | 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 | 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 | 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | | | | | Calendar |
|
feeds | |
| | If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals | |
| | Author | Message |
---|
alittletouched Seeker
Number of posts : 53 Age : 55 Location : Terre Hauet, IN Registration date : 2009-06-11
| Subject: If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals Wed Aug 12, 2009 4:32 pm | |
| What are some of the other things could Bill, Pat, and Kevin do or put on the show to keep the showbiz people happy? The ideal of a female, smart, young and sexy a most but what other things could they do to pitch to HC that are hits for the other cable networks. How about the Househusband of the UFO's a direct take off of bravo's housewifes or how about UFO ink - Bill, Pat and Kevin open up a shop and make the show a soap. Make the show a soapy blow up of the guy's lives that's big right now on cable. How about a show like Jesse James is a dead man, placing Kevin and Pat in deadly things each week that would get ratings. I'm not saying Kevin is bad and I did wish him harm but per views I'd say Kevin would be the safe bet to place in harms way each week hands down but they do love watching Pat being placed in wells and narrow caves? Dose anybody else have ideals to help the boys pitch to HC? Peace Out. | |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals Thu Aug 13, 2009 2:15 pm | |
| The problem isn't the ratings with UFO Hunters, it may be that History Channel is changing the demographics that watch it. They seem to be peddling to young male viewers with such shows as Ice Road Truckers and the latest about pawn shops.
They may still keep other programs on the air, but that does seem unlikely when the higher ups want to change who is watching to target certain advertisers.
My change to the show (if it would help keep it on the air) would be to follow how UFO Files did their episodes. Less personality and more about the subject of the show. I like the people in the show, but some viewers may not like them as much. |
| | | TheyExist...What now? New Member
Number of posts : 3 Registration date : 2009-08-15
| Subject: Re: If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals Sat Aug 15, 2009 2:37 am | |
| [quote="kidflash2008"]
My change to the show (if it would help keep it on the air) would be to follow how UFO Files did their episodes. quote]
I kind of agree, I enjoy more information and less drama, although I admit I was entertained by the crew getting more involved with the show. It was just a different kind of entertainment.
Either way, I can't wait to see the last episodes. | |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals Sat Aug 15, 2009 4:12 pm | |
| Another idea is to do episodes on some older cases from the 1950s and 1960s, while some of the witnesses are still with us. I would also like to see some follow-ups on the Pascagoula MS abduction and other similar cases. |
| | | TheyExist...What now? New Member
Number of posts : 3 Registration date : 2009-08-15
| Subject: Re: If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals Mon Aug 17, 2009 2:42 am | |
| Yeah for sure. My personal dream show would be if they could get Bob Lazar on for an entire hour, and bring up all the behind the scenes details that really haven't surfaced. Such as, the samples of element 115 he has hidden somewhere, (George Knapp actually saw the container it was in, and has film of it he put in one of the first interviews). As well as a bunch of other things, like witness' that haven't even been asked to come forward yet, like his Ex wife, or her sister and her sisters friend that saw Bob's House get raided for a background check. Or how Bob took George Knapp into and through Los Alamos and everyone there smiled and waved at him, including security throughout the place. I'd love to see all the footage from that, that never made it out. Too bad Bob doesn't give a darn about if anyone believes him or not. | |
| | | alittletouched Seeker
Number of posts : 53 Age : 55 Location : Terre Hauet, IN Registration date : 2009-06-11
| Subject: Re: If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals Tue Aug 18, 2009 5:48 pm | |
| Lets be honest History channel would love to have a show take off like the housewives. A show all about nothing but greed, and made up drama. To be real history wouldn't care if they didn't put a female on the show if they changed the format that bought younger viewer either if they trying to kill Kevin or Pat each week and/or blowing things up would do it. I'm sure History would love it if they also could market the show make a profit off T-shirts, hats and others stuff. Maybe the guy's are going about it wrong not knocking on History's door to keep the show but going to the companies that buy ad time on the show? Maybe they have to look at the problem a different way to make them look better to history and not what history thinks they should look like to get something that they won't get. Remember if you personal try to change to fit into a group it never works, the show is the same way the show has to be itself without changing. The key its where does the show fit to get it to work as itsself? Peace Out | |
| | | Guest Guest
| Subject: Re: If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals Fri Aug 21, 2009 5:30 pm | |
| Why not do a program updating the evidence from the ancient astronaut theories? Much has been learned and measurements taken that would show that the theorists have many good questions about the subject.
Also, the Starchild skull is going to be genetically mapped shortly. That could also be a good follow through episode. |
| | | onlychild Keyholder for Area 51
Number of posts : 1020 Age : 74 Location : Texas Registration date : 2009-10-15
| Subject: Re: If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals Sun Oct 18, 2009 12:22 pm | |
| Hi all Here is my 2 cents. 1) At 60 years old I have had it with the "sightings" approach. I have been watching that crap since the '60s - enough already; call me when they land and get out and say hi. 2) I have had it with "the govt doesn't want to tell us anything" approach - boo-hoo-hoo. :/ Now I realize that this is a young world and today's youth needs to catch up with the things I am tired of hearing, but for God sakes let's move on to the WHYs of all this. Oh wait - no one knows why. Do you mean to say that after 60+ years of this stuff NO ONE has figured out why? It seems to me that all we are doing is picking up pieces - but NO ONE is putting these pieces together. What about the alleged contactees? Well, evidently they aren't privy to WHY information because if they were, we would KNOW by now. Look, you want a new show, someone contact Mr Byrnes and tell him to write to me; and ask him what the pic below represents, why it connects to the poet Longfellow, as well as the WHY everyone is looking for. We need to wake up - soon - because TPTB already know the answer. The KEY below is in exactly the right place - someone knew the answer | |
| | | Sponsored content
| Subject: Re: If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals | |
| |
| | | | If History wants higher ratings why didn't we give them other ideals | |
|
Similar topics | |
|
| Permissions in this forum: | You cannot reply to topics in this forum
| |
| |
| |