Messengers of Light.

what are the members views of "Messengers of Light"

Tommy.x.

Can you be more specific as to what you mean? There are many references to Messengers of Light on the internet, and if you could cite which one you mean that would be helpful to respond to the question.

Thank you,

Lloyd

Hi Tommcferran ,
The Messengers of the Light are here to awaken the "Children of the Light"
That's my view .

onlychild wrote:

Let us not forget other possibilities as well; as House said:

PSYCHIATRIST: What makes you believe that you are God?

PATIENT: Because evry time I pray to God, I find that I'm talking to myself !

Quote :

PSYCHIATRIST: What makes you believe that you are God?

PATIENT: Because evry time I pray to God, I find that I'm talking to myself !

Thanks Albert , that tickled me !

TOMMCFERRAN wrote:

what are the members views of "Messengers of Light"

Tommy.x.

I have checked on many messengers of light groups and there some that do channeling and other means of communications with aliens.

I am one who needs some evidence or something to show they can do what they claim. Too many charlatans out there take advantage of people. The one rule to follow is not to give any money or financial information to these groups. As the Sergeant used to say on Hill Street Blues: "Let's be careful out there".

The idea of a "messenger" from a "higher power" is an OLD approach that has bled-over to today. If someone was what they claimed to be there would be proof - and there isn't.

Quote :

The idea of a "messenger" from a "higher power" is an OLD approach that has bled-over to today. If someone was what they claimed to be there would be proof - and there isn't.
_________________

That's interesting Onlychild . I suppose ultimately there is no proof of anything and a true "messenger" would not claim to be anything . We may not even notice them .
Only the ego demands recognition .

free wheel wrote:

Quote :

The idea of a "messenger" from a "higher power" is an OLD approach that has bled-over to today. If someone was what they claimed to be there would be proof - and there isn't.
_________________

That's interesting Onlychild . I suppose ultimately there is no proof of anything and a true "messenger" would not claim to be anything . We may not even notice them .
Only the ego demands recognition .

The idea of a messenger (the son of the god and woman / god and goddess) goes back to when history was rewritten. The old story (the goddess symbol) was squashed, ie, Osiris (Orion, where the archetype lies) died. It was his son who would come and straighten out the mess. But Osiris never died; Osiris never existed and Isis never gathered body parts. Plutarch said it best:

… For Isis is a Greek word, and so also is
Typhon, her enemy, who is conceited, as his name
implies, because of his ignorance and self
-deception. He tears to pieces and scatters to
the winds the sacred writings, which the goddess
collects and puts together …


We should be able to put two and two together when we hear it, but it seems most cannot, or will not. As Thomas Gilovich said:

People ... simply disregard pertinent evidence in order to see what they expect to see and believe what they expect to believe. People subtly and carefully 'massage’ the evidence to make it consistent with their expectations.

If people want a message, all they need to know is that it is under their noses - in the library.

I like grapes.

Quote :

If people want a message, all they need to know is that it is under their noses - in the library.

I would agree with that Onlychild . But how would you interpret someones experiencing the delivery of a message
that as far as they are aware , they were not looking for ?

Interesting thread this .