Newb reporting in

Just found the site (Ok- overheard it listening to C2C)

I'd like to say that I do like the show. It's entertaining, but for a bit of constructive criticism, I think an investigation should be made from a skeptical point of view. I don't mean debunker. I define a debunker as the opposite of a believer- he's out to do anything to naysay and nitpick.

A skeptic however, approaches more or less neutral- They test every possibility (when possible). If it turns out to be a meteor, fine. If the DOD blocks your inquiry (crashed satellite, J-Rod cranky, ect) that's its own story.

I guess what I'm saying is watching the investigators sitting around at some point postulating what 'might' be going on- its entertaining to think about, but I don't consider it investigation. It's fun to go try to prove something you believe in, but it's not even approaching the objectivity needed for a real investigation.