The truth about crop circles

I have been to Avebury a few times and witnessed and watched crop circles being made by man. I am pretty sure that virtualy all the crop circles are made by man but this doesnt mean they are not real explination. I met one of the men who create the circles he was even filmed doing it.When asked why do you do it he doesnt know he just has an image appear in his head and he has to go and make it. I can tell you he does it in only a few hours with adrawing in front of him, he literaly runs around the field with someone behind him with a wooden board. Personaly if i had the same picture in front of me in daylight on a sandy beach and was asked to create the same image in the same time I couldnt this guy does it in pitch black in a corn field with no other instruments than a picture, I believe in away he was guided when creating the crop circle. The next question is the corn itself when examined it is said the corn is bent and not broken which is supposedly impossible in normal circumstances this is correct. You cant take a stem of corn and bend it without breaking it exept if it is wet, if you had slept outside at Avebury you would have noticed that at night everything is soaking wet because of the damp air which means the corn also is soaking wet and is easy to bend. I am sorry if this theory might upset afew dedicated believers of crop circles being created by ETs personaly I think it is a little sad that only ETs can create such amazing formations and we are not capable which is not true man is capable of creating the most amazing things without having to have a reason why just because they feel they have to like any artist. My conclusion is that most of the crop circles that are created by man are real because we as humans still are capable of the most amazing things which seem to come from a source inside of us which we dont understand which is the beauty of the human race, we still have alot to learn maybe if we stopped asking why and questioning everything that cant be explained easily maybe the answer might be a lot more apparant. Tim

Very good viewpoint timfrance!
Onlychild,
Some of the circlemakers do create a mess in the fields for sure, but not all. If you are "driven" to
go out at night and create a work that is inspired and beautiful, how would going on FB or whatever
and posting a drawing or image even come close to conveying the energy that a lot of these designs do? Or maybe you haven't really looked at them?
FW

Well Onlychild, as far as i am aware, most circlemakers consider that they are compelled
to make them. Most, but not all, don't know why. Are you suggesting that the majority
of circlemakers suffer from OCD?
FW

He He, some people do win the lottery Onlychild!

onlychild wrote:

free wheel wrote:

He He, some people do win the lottery Onlychild!

Someone always wins - just not me

Brilliant OC. You may not have rushed to an instant belief, or interpretation, but you have, ultimately
arrived at the same place! We all have!
So, what is real?
FW

It definitely was man made Onlychild. They all are!

FW

I am aware of Levengood's report on Eastfield 777 formation Onlychild.
I have however revisited it and refreshed my mind as to what he concluded.
Thanks for posting the link, it saved me some time!
All i can say to you is this. I understand that the 777 is relevant to you because
it would confirm many things for you as regards your research. I happen to know
almost all of the people mentioned in the report and many of them are very close
friends of mine. This formation was absolutely man made. You will either have to
take my word for it, or not. However, the crop circle phenomenon is far more
complex than most people realise, and many of the "researchers" are sadly way off the mark
when it comes to having any grip at all on what may be truly going on.
Regardless of it's origins, this formation may truly have a message in it for you. Nothing
odd about that in my view. May i suggest that you have a good dig into the phenomenon
of balls of light witnessed by many in very close proximity to this field and surrounding area.
And even more specifically, light beings. Also check out Adams grave, which looks over
the East field. Silbury hill also known as the hill of the shining beings may be of great interest to you.
Hope this is of interest Onlychild.
Catch you later.

FW

I really dont think you will find an answer Onlychild. What is the question?
FW

[quote="free wheel"]I really dont think you will find an answer Onlychild. What is the question?/quote]

Basically, why you say "I happen to know almost all of the people mentioned in the report and many of them are very close friends of mine. This formation was absolutely man made. You will either have to take my word for it, or not." Someone is - mistaken - here, as that scientific evaluation says you are wrong.

[quote="onlychild"]

free wheel wrote:

I really dont think you will find an answer Onlychild. What is the question?/quote]

Basically, why you say "I happen to know almost all of the people mentioned in the report and many of them are very close friends of mine. This formation was absolutely man made. You will either have to take my word for it, or not." Someone is - mistaken - here, as that scientific evaluation says you are wrong.

Most of the people cited in the report also now understand that this formation was manmade. Most have very carefully pulled away and tried to save face!
Again, this simple fact, and it is a FACT, does not mean that this formation is not a connected anomaly for you.
Did you do any digging into the related phenomenon i mentioned a couple of posts ago?

FW

I can"t prove anything Onlychild. I suspect you cant either!
I'm not about to start contacting my friends and asking them to e mail you in order to solidify your beliefs!
The levengood report wasn't necessarily a lie, just an ill informed conclusion!
Am i wrong?
FW

onlychild wrote:

free wheel wrote:

I can"t prove anything Onlychild.

Then why would you make a statement "This formation was absolutely man made." "Absolutely was" is the direct opposite of "can't prove anything".

Because it was! And "Absolutely was, is not the direct opposite of "cant prove anything"



I suspect you cant either!

No, I can't - hence the reason I'm trying to get information to put a picture together. The East Field piece has been sitting on shelf in my head for awhile ... I want answers.
[color=white]
I have just given you your answer!


I'm not about to start contacting my friends and asking them to e mail you in order to solidify your beliefs!

The only "beliefs" that exist here begin with proving that this is, or isn't, some extravagant hoax. Why wouldn't you want to get to the bottom of this?

I have already got to the bottom of this!

The levengood report wasn't necessarily a lie, just an ill informed conclusion! Am i wrong?

THAT is why I wanted answers. If you can make a statement like that, then you MUST have the information to back that statement up. How else would you know it was "ill informed"?

Go figure!

FW

See ya Onlychild, good luck on your quest.

FW