Contactees: Children of the Gods

Subject: Re: Contactees: Children of the Gods Thu Mar 31, 2011 7:48 am

davefair wrote:: It is with no little intrest that I follow that which is written here.
I am one of the little folks who came looking for an answer.
With great a great heart Only Child gave me the answer to my quest.
My God what a mind expanding answer it was.
Yet in my ignorance I ran in little circles saying,"There has to be more?"
In the end I came to an inexcapable conclusion. There is no more.
The answer was so simple I simply could not grasp it at first.
Hi! That's all it is.
Dave(the inlightened)fair

I am STILL trying to figure it out! I have totally forgotten how to be simple. I have even considered asking my kids. Somebody tell me pleeeeease! LMAO!

Subject: Re: Contactees: Children of the Gods Fri Apr 08, 2011 9:52 am

Ragdoll73 wrote:: I am STILL trying to figure it out! I have totally forgotten how to be simple. I have even considered asking my kids. Somebody tell me pleeeeease! LMAO!

Based on what I have been able to put together over the last 37 years - the bottom line is that ET does NOT show up here (despite what people have had to say) unless there is a galactic superwave coming. Now this doesn't mean ALL possible data has been found; this picture is based on Dr LaViolette's superwave research and the dates involved are C 40,000 BC and C 13,500 BC. Also, it SEEMS, based on at least two epic failures on the part of humanity, if you refuse their help - that's fine - good luck - you are on your own. The 13,500 BC event also had a seeming comet impact C 10,000 BC - and the N American continent was toasted. The people who lived here, the so called Clovis culture, disappeared. The other epic failure seems to have been the Toba event, C 72,000 BC, and the aftermath was a genetic bottleneck that showed (if I remember correctly) somewhere around 35,000 people survived the event globally.

Why don't we know about this - "help"? Because there was a MINOR superwave event C 3300 BC, the ancients saw the galactic center shining in the sky, put 2 and 2 together and came up with 51. They thought help was supposed to arrive, it didn't, panic set in on ONE SPOT on the globe (Egypt and Sumer), and history was rewritten. The "sign of life" (what we call the mother goddess) was eliminated and replaced with a new story, the "goddess" was given a "husband" and a "son", and everything went down the tubes as the centuries went on.

ET is not "coming" - ET is HERE. We are in the middle of an arrival stage and no one has (or wants it seems) a clue as to what is going on.

Verification of the fact that a superwave is coming would be a nice addition to this picture, unfortunately, we will never see it coming until it's too late. This event is moving at near light speed and we won't see it until it hits - and then it's going to be too late. Based on the work Dr LaViolette has done, the superwave isn't the only thing we are going to be dealing with. The gravity wave that hits here first, will probably set off every weak section of earth's crust, as well as any volcano that's near ready to blow.

On top of all this, the last 5000+ years have given rise to so many new beliefs, and so much groundless thinking, that no one is focused on the actual picture of "ET help" in the face of destruction. What are we supposed to do? I'll give you the last line I heard after the epic failure I went through putting this picture together without data: Take all of your beliefs, put them in a pile in front of you, AND BACK AWAY!

All I have ever asked is SOMEONE prove me wrong.

Subject: Re: Contactees: Children of the Gods Sat Apr 09, 2011 3:06 pm

Okay, I am going to jump in here. First, Jeremy: the reason that most channelings spew little more than "new age gobblety gook" is because we STILL don't get it! Such is the nature of prophecy, no matter what the source.

I find it humorous that the first thing that people ask of a channeler or a contactee or a prophet (choose your term) is: "what can you do to make me believe you?" The whole nature of prophecy is not to convince materialists that the immaterial is "real" - but to advance the spiritual nature of man. John's "channeled message" falls directly into this category, as does all other "new age gobbelty gook", regardless of the source.

In fact, why stop at channelers and contactees? Isn't this new age "gobblety gook" pretty much the same stuff (repackaged) that was spread by the great cultural prophets such as Jesus, Buddha, Confucious, Gandhi and Martin Luther King? As long as man remains a spiritually back-sliding, cultural sociopath, we will continue to need this kind of instruction.

Granted, the above "teaching" of John's, does not fall into the profundity of Jesus' sermon on the mount, or Martin Luther King's "I have a dream" speech, but it follows the same relative curve. And equally, there are few people out there who will hang on every word of an avowed channeler. But such folks do have an audience, even if a small one. Water does not erode a rock with brute force, it eats away at it slowly, particle by particle.

I still hold to the idea that the importance of our historical contactees was not whether or not they were "hoaxers" or their experiences were "real", but in the delivery of their potent message. Frankly, I don't care of they were authentic or con-men. They delivered their message. And from a spiritual and socially historical standpoint, I think that was all they were ever meant to do.

I find it humorous that so few have ears to hear them. And until we all do, they will probably continue to spew "new age gobblety gook" at every turn. But we can stop this endless stream of questionable material. All we have to do is stop being spiritually back-sliding, cultural sociopaths and, "get it"! So, who is listening?

albino

Subject: Re: Contactees: Children of the Gods Sat Apr 09, 2011 4:06 pm

Mike Good wrote:: So, who is listening?

No one really.
Any "message," as far as I am concerned, should be able to show itself for what it is via full data examination. Some time back I did a study on dreams in our subject, and my final conclusions were simply this: It was totally impossible to draw a dividing line between real and imagined dream data. It didn't mean dreams were to be trashed, it meant there was no way to determine if they were true, hence they couldn't be trusted.

Usually there is a line injected at this point of failure where people say the giver of the message "couldn't get it right because of a time difference between them and us" or "a dimensional difference" or some lame excuse that completely bypasses the obvious.

The bottom line is simple: We are not thinking correctly.

Subject: Re: Contactees: Children of the Gods Sat Apr 09, 2011 6:11 pm

The first step in thinking correctly is remembering your last thoughts. For me anyway....Lol.
To Mike: People who lie become snared in their own traps and do not deserve to be let out to set more. I may not be sure of where I'm going, but I know damn well who not to follow. I will warn the unsuspecting. Just call me charitable.

Subject: Re: Contactees: Children of the Gods Mon Apr 11, 2011 2:42 pm

Mike Good says: "First, Jeremy: the reason that most channelings spew little more than "new age gobblety gook" is because we STILL don't get it! Such is the nature of prophecy, no matter what the source."

Oh. And all this time I thought it was because they had nothing new to add or draw on but truisms that have been said a thousand times because they are delusional or full of shit. I'll have to rethink that.

Subject: Re: Contactees: Children of the Gods Mon Apr 11, 2011 10:36 pm

oddly enough,
channeling is not true channeling. To be a channler is to give your body as a host to the enity that desires it. I.E. a subjugation of ones own spirit/soul.
If in following that thought out, where then would your soul/spirit go. Also by giving control to an "enity" you would loose all knowledge of what had transpired durring that period of time. If the enity were truly intrested in communication it would be easier to just swap bodies for a period of time. Some thing like remote viewing.
Telepathic communication sounds far more viable then channeling.
We know, in this time and juncture, that what ever man's mind can conceive man can creat.
Man,was created, in God's image.
What would that make man?
Are we so foolish as to believe that we are the only life in this universe.
dave(the idiot)fair

Subject: Re: Contactees: Children of the Gods Tue Apr 12, 2011 10:31 am

davefair wrote:: oddly enough,
channeling is not true channeling.

House:
"You know it's all nice when people start to dig these holes, but then they start to live in these holes and get angry when someone pushes dirt into those holes. Come out of your holes people!!!"

Subject: Re: Contactees: Children of the Gods Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:45 pm

onlychild wrote:

davefair wrote:: oddly enough,
channeling is not true channeling.

House:
"You know it's all nice when people start to dig these holes, but then they start to live in these holes and get angry when someone pushes dirt into those holes. Come out of your holes people!!!"

I love that analogy, though I like to stick a garden hose in them.

Subject: Re: Contactees: Children of the Gods Tue Apr 12, 2011 7:56 pm

I love House lol!

» Contactees are the Creator Gods Returning to the Earth
» contactees of the 50s and 60s
» Gods of Creation