<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/" xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
	<channel>
		<title>Roswell</title>
		<link>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/-t1.htm</link>
		<description></description>
		<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:51:52 GMT</lastBuildDate>
		<ttl>10</ttl>
		
		<item>
			<title>Kevin Randle's research on V-2 rocket explanation</title>
			<link>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/kevin-randle-s-research-on-v-2-rocket-explanation-t424.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<description>Kevin Randle has posted a blog on his research regarding new &quot;documents&quot; that have purported to show that V-2 rocket launches were the cause of the Roswell crash:



http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2009/11/v-2-launches-and-ufos.html



Major Randle is one of the best researchers out there on the Roswell incident and does look into all the explanations given about what happened. </description>
			<category>Roswell</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:51:52 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/kevin-randle-s-research-on-v-2-rocket-explanation-t424.htm#2899</comments>
			<guid>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/kevin-randle-s-research-on-v-2-rocket-explanation-t424.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Here is my take on Roswell</title>
			<link>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/here-is-my-take-on-roswell-t386.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>onlychild</dc:creator>
			<description><![CDATA[No matter what, if Roswell wasn't important then why is there a &quot;33&quot; year count between Roswell and the doom of the Georgia Guidestones?
<br />
1947 - 1980
<br />

<br />
<img src="http://www.nothingtoseehere.net/images/georgia-guidestones.jpg" border="0" alt="" />]]></description>
			<category>Roswell</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 19 Oct 2009 00:06:24 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/here-is-my-take-on-roswell-t386.htm#2702</comments>
			<guid>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/here-is-my-take-on-roswell-t386.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Roswell Disk</title>
			<link>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/the-roswell-disk-t368.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<description>This is one of the biggest enigmatic problems I have with Roswell. The ranchers never describe a disk, but just some debris strewn all over their ranch. However, the base commander states in the press release that a disk was found and brought back to the base. This supports the theory by Stanton Friedman and others that there were two crash sites.



The question now is, who first saw the full disk, and where did it crash? I do not think the colonel would of made this one up, as the Cold War  ...</description>
			<category>Roswell</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 20:36:12 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/the-roswell-disk-t368.htm#2569</comments>
			<guid>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/the-roswell-disk-t368.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The debris of the Roswell crash</title>
			<link>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/the-debris-of-the-roswell-crash-t325.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<description>As I think about what happened at Roswell, more ideas pop into my head (not always good ones!). If a Project Mogul test balloon with measuring instruments were what really crashed, why would the military cordon off the area? The materials used (including measuring devices) were not classified and could of been brought in by a detail. Or the military could of asked the ranchers to bring in what they found as they found it. Most of the stuff would of been useless debris that the military would  ...</description>
			<category>Roswell</category>
			<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:08:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/the-debris-of-the-roswell-crash-t325.htm#2369</comments>
			<guid>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/the-debris-of-the-roswell-crash-t325.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>The Ramey Document</title>
			<link>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/the-ramey-document-t323.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<description>The document that Brigadier General Ramey is holding in the publicity photos after the weather balloon story get another look at by Barry Greenwood:



http://kevinrandle.blogspot.com/2009/09/ramey-memo-and-barry-greenwood.html



It does look like it was just a press release he was holding. Others have noticed and so have I: Why would a flag officer hold a top secret document without its cover slip? </description>
			<category>Roswell</category>
			<pubDate>Sun, 13 Sep 2009 20:59:18 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/the-ramey-document-t323.htm#2355</comments>
			<guid>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/the-ramey-document-t323.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Texas' Roswell, Aurora</title>
			<link>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/texas-roswell-aurora-t307.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Quendan</dc:creator>
			<description>I assume everyone reading this is aware of Aurora, TX, 1897 Unidentified Flying/Falling Object that crashed into a windmill and exploded. I'd like to know if anyone has an answer to my question; Why does it seem that all the documented investigations into this event gloss over the materials found on site during their investigation or a previous investigation?



I watched the History Channel's &quot;UFO Files&quot;, investigation into this event and the first thing in comparison to others is  ...</description>
			<category>Roswell</category>
			<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 20:55:41 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/texas-roswell-aurora-t307.htm#2218</comments>
			<guid>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/texas-roswell-aurora-t307.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Documents show debris from Roswell was tested and shown to be extraterrestrial.</title>
			<link>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/documents-show-debris-from-roswell-was-tested-and-shown-to-be-extraterrestrial-t161.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Anonymous</dc:creator>
			<description>Researcher Frank Warren has a blog on the debris found at Roswell that shows it to be extraterrestrial. Several people confirm the documents exist, and memos found refer to such documents existing. This stunning bit of news shows that even old cases such as the 62 year old Roswell Crash always are developing something new. Here is the blog:



http://www.theufochronicles.com/search?q=roswell+debris



The article itself is quite fascinating, and has more to it than the usual third person  ...</description>
			<category>Roswell</category>
			<pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 22:37:08 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/documents-show-debris-from-roswell-was-tested-and-shown-to-be-extraterrestrial-t161.htm#971</comments>
			<guid>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/documents-show-debris-from-roswell-was-tested-and-shown-to-be-extraterrestrial-t161.htm</guid>
		</item>
		<item>
			<title>Roswell Resolved:</title>
			<link>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/roswell-resolved-t16.htm</link>
			<dc:creator>Alfred Lehmberg</dc:creator>
			<description>Resolved: The facts of Roswell point to an actual occurrence of the highest strangeness.</description>
			<category>Roswell</category>
			<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 13:28:58 GMT</pubDate>
			<comments>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/roswell-resolved-t16.htm#38</comments>
			<guid>http://ufomagazine.forumotion.com/roswell-f5/roswell-resolved-t16.htm</guid>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>